<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Lets Slip On Social Bookmarking Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seosatellite.com/index.php/2008/03/18/google-lets-slip-on-social-bookmarking-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seosatellite.com/index.php/2008/03/18/google-lets-slip-on-social-bookmarking-rules/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 09:25:02 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alexander-socail media guy</title>
		<link>http://www.seosatellite.com/index.php/2008/03/18/google-lets-slip-on-social-bookmarking-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>alexander-socail media guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seosatellite.com/index.php/2008/03/18/google-lets-slip-on-social-bookmarking-rules/#comment-908</guid>
		<description>This is quite interesting and good find David. The part directly from google about slapping down the social bookmarking abuse will be good for all.

Chris you make an excellent point. Having a natural social profile with lots of stuff you&#039;re interested in and links to many different types of content you don&#039;t own is key.

OF course, you can keep the topics focused around things you&#039;re interested in but just have a natural profile a regular user would have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quite interesting and good find David. The part directly from google about slapping down the social bookmarking abuse will be good for all.</p>
<p>Chris you make an excellent point. Having a natural social profile with lots of stuff you&#8217;re interested in and links to many different types of content you don&#8217;t own is key.</p>
<p>OF course, you can keep the topics focused around things you&#8217;re interested in but just have a natural profile a regular user would have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.seosatellite.com/index.php/2008/03/18/google-lets-slip-on-social-bookmarking-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seosatellite.com/index.php/2008/03/18/google-lets-slip-on-social-bookmarking-rules/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>After I read allot of bloggers ready to dump Digg over this I had to reply.

Calm down guys, you are about to throw the baby out with the bath water. Google did not say &quot;penalize bloggers who use Digg&quot; they said &quot;Bloggers who abuse Digg&quot;

What they are saying is &quot;STOP SUBMITTING YOUR OWN BLOG POSTS&quot; and the &quot;STOP SHOUTING YOUR OWN CONTENT&quot; and doing nothing more. If all you do is submit your own blog and then shout it to your friends then you are already screwed. Google has been watching this for a while now and I told you all this months ago but no one wanted to believe me.

You all wanted to just keep submitting you own stuff and then shouting it to your friends. Oh look, I got a 110 Diggs today. Look what that is going to get you now. If you have been doing this you are already screwed. It is in everybody&#039;s history, not just their private history either, their public history. Yeah, every shout you ever sent, all over Digg. 

Too late my friends. You people have been doing this for so long just to get a couple measily diggs that you forgot that Google is watching. I blogged this months ago here: 

http://www.keywebdata.com/?p=79

Digg banned me for writing that article, I published it and the next morning, KeyWebData.com is banned from Digg. Accused of spam by the Digg mafia. Don&#039;t know what the Digg mafia is? Keep publishing SEO articles on Digg and you will find out. Or you could just Google &quot;digg mafia&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After I read allot of bloggers ready to dump Digg over this I had to reply.</p>
<p>Calm down guys, you are about to throw the baby out with the bath water. Google did not say &#8220;penalize bloggers who use Digg&#8221; they said &#8220;Bloggers who abuse Digg&#8221;</p>
<p>What they are saying is &#8220;STOP SUBMITTING YOUR OWN BLOG POSTS&#8221; and the &#8220;STOP SHOUTING YOUR OWN CONTENT&#8221; and doing nothing more. If all you do is submit your own blog and then shout it to your friends then you are already screwed. Google has been watching this for a while now and I told you all this months ago but no one wanted to believe me.</p>
<p>You all wanted to just keep submitting you own stuff and then shouting it to your friends. Oh look, I got a 110 Diggs today. Look what that is going to get you now. If you have been doing this you are already screwed. It is in everybody&#8217;s history, not just their private history either, their public history. Yeah, every shout you ever sent, all over Digg. </p>
<p>Too late my friends. You people have been doing this for so long just to get a couple measily diggs that you forgot that Google is watching. I blogged this months ago here: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.keywebdata.com/?p=79" rel="nofollow">http://www.keywebdata.com/?p=79</a></p>
<p>Digg banned me for writing that article, I published it and the next morning, KeyWebData.com is banned from Digg. Accused of spam by the Digg mafia. Don&#8217;t know what the Digg mafia is? Keep publishing SEO articles on Digg and you will find out. Or you could just Google &#8220;digg mafia&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
